[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: Global section in CIF headers
- To: "Discussion list of the IUCr Committee for the Maintenance of the CIFStandard (COMCIFS)" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Global section in CIF headers
- From: "Herbert J. Bernstein" <[email protected]>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:04:55 -0400 (EDT)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]>
The proposal itself seems to have gotten detached from the commentary, and it has been through several iterations. I would suggest first having one complete formal proposal and then deciding whether that proposal is suited to a small change or fast track process or not. ===================================================== Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121 Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769 +1-631-244-3035 [email protected] ===================================================== On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, David Brown wrote: > > > James Hester wrote: > >> >> Are there any objections to formalising this into a dictionary >> enhancement proposal? It would probably fit under the recently >> proposed procedure for small changes. >> >> > I could put this through under fast track, but before I do this I would like > to see a little more thought given to the proposal, particularly the > enumeration list. > > David > > >
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- Global section in CIF headers (Joe Krahn)
- Re: Global section in CIF headers (Brian H. Toby)
- Re: Global section in CIF headers (James Hester)
- Re: Global section in CIF headers (Brian McMahon)
- Re: Global section in CIF headers (James Hester)
- Re: Global section in CIF headers (David Brown)
- Prev by Date: Re: Global section in CIF headers
- Next by Date: Re: Procedure for approving small dictionary updates
- Prev by thread: Re: Global section in CIF headers
- Next by thread: Formation of a DDLm working group
- Index(es):