Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Result of CIF2 vote

Dear Colleagues,

   We might save some time if the other voting members of COMCIFS
were to express there views on Ralf's suggestion for the 
wording change for change 7 immediately.  I support it.  If
a majority of COMCIFS support it right now, we are in a much less
ambiguous position than if it is a minority position, and
can try to make very real progress on coding before Madrid,


  Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
    Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
         Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769


On Fri, 31 Dec 2010, James Hester wrote:

> Dear COMCIFS members and advisers:
> At the end of the 6-week voting period, the CIF2 draft has been
> approved 4 votes in favour, one against and one abstention.
> While we can choose to ignore the points raised by Ralf in his
> dissenting vote, I think it would be worthwhile revisiting eliding in
> triple-quoted strings.  Such a discussion is best handled in the DDLm
> group, so if this aspect of the standard interests any of you who are
> not currently enrolled in the DDLm-group, I suggest that you contact
> Brian MacMahon to be subscribed.
> I believe the DDLm group will be able to find a solution.  If we are
> unable to agree, then the standard as currently approved will be the
> final version.  If we do find a solution, then an amendment to Change
> 7 will once again be presented to this forum for a final vote.  I
> would hope that we can produce an amendment by the end of January at
> the latest.
> James Hester.
> -- 
> T +61 (02) 9717 9907
> F +61 (02) 9717 3145
> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
> _______________________________________________
> comcifs mailing list
> comcifs@iucr.org
> http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/comcifs

Reply to: [list | sender only]