[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: Result of CIF2 vote
- To: "Discussion list of the IUCr Committee for the Maintenance of the CIFStandard (COMCIFS)" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Result of CIF2 vote
- From: James Hester <[email protected]>
- Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 00:41:22 +1100
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]><[email protected]>
Dear COMCIFS: I cannot support Ralf's suggestion immediately. I anticipate issues based on previous discussions in the DDLm group, and will address them in that forum. Happy New Year James. On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Herbert J. Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > � We might save some time if the other voting members of COMCIFS > were to express there views on Ralf's suggestion for the > wording change for change 7 immediately. �I support it. �If > a majority of COMCIFS support it right now, we are in a much less > ambiguous position than if it is a minority position, and > can try to make very real progress on coding before Madrid, > > � Regards, > � � Herbert > > > ===================================================== > �Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science > � �Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121 > � � � � Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769 > > � � � � � � � � �+1-631-244-3035 > � � � � � � � � �[email protected] > ===================================================== > > On Fri, 31 Dec 2010, James Hester wrote: > >> Dear COMCIFS members and advisers: >> >> At the end of the 6-week voting period, the CIF2 draft has been >> approved 4 votes in favour, one against and one abstention. >> >> While we can choose to ignore the points raised by Ralf in his >> dissenting vote, I think it would be worthwhile revisiting eliding in >> triple-quoted strings. �Such a discussion is best handled in the DDLm >> group, so if this aspect of the standard interests any of you who are >> not currently enrolled in the DDLm-group, I suggest that you contact >> Brian MacMahon to be subscribed. >> >> I believe the DDLm group will be able to find a solution. �If we are >> unable to agree, then the standard as currently approved will be the >> final version. �If we do find a solution, then an amendment to Change >> 7 will once again be presented to this forum for a final vote. �I >> would hope that we can produce an amendment by the end of January at >> the latest. >> >> James Hester. >> -- >> T +61 (02) 9717 9907 >> F +61 (02) 9717 3145 >> M +61 (04) 0249 4148 >> _______________________________________________ >> comcifs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/comcifs >> > _______________________________________________ > comcifs mailing list > [email protected] > http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/comcifs > -- T +61 (02) 9717 9907 F +61 (02) 9717 3145 M +61 (04) 0249 4148
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Result of CIF2 vote (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- References:
- Result of CIF2 vote (James Hester)
- Re: Result of CIF2 vote (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Prev by Date: Re: Result of CIF2 vote
- Next by Date: Re: Result of CIF2 vote
- Prev by thread: Re: Result of CIF2 vote
- Next by thread: Re: Result of CIF2 vote
- Index(es):