[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Preserving CIF1 data sets
- To: comcifs@iucr.org
- Subject: Preserving CIF1 data sets
- From: "Herbert J. Bernstein" <yaya@bernstein-plus-sons.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:07:12 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101071052280.2950@epsilon.pair.com>
- References: <AANLkTimWpd1kMZDGcTprEhcJw+uQE4_JtgJ4SbtMPVXt@mail.gmail.com><263453.61027.qm@web87016.mail.ird.yahoo.com><alpine.BSF.2.00.1101070742350.2950@epsilon.pair.com><4D271B81.2050501@rcsb.rutgers.edu><alpine.BSF.2.00.1101071052280.2950@epsilon.pair.com>
Do anyone recall if there ever was a formal decision on "No changes are required in existing archival data files in order to apply domain dictionaries written in DDLm." as stated in bold type on http://www.iucr.org/resources/cif/ddl/ddlm It might help in avoiding further incorrect assumptions to know if this is or is not a premise for DDLm and CIF2 development. I for one think this would be a desirable premise. -- ===================================================== Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121 Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769 +1-631-244-3035 yaya@dowling.edu =====================================================
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: Resignation of voting member
- Next by Date: 2010 COMCIFS annual report - request for information
- Prev by thread: Re: 2010 COMCIFS annual report - request for information
- Next by thread: Resignation of voting member
- Index(es):