[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Preserving CIF1 data sets
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Preserving CIF1 data sets
- From: "Herbert J. Bernstein" <[email protected]>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:07:12 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]>
Do anyone recall if there ever was a formal decision on "No changes are required in existing archival data files in order to apply domain dictionaries written in DDLm." as stated in bold type on http://www.iucr.org/resources/cif/ddl/ddlm It might help in avoiding further incorrect assumptions to know if this is or is not a premise for DDLm and CIF2 development. I for one think this would be a desirable premise. -- ===================================================== Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121 Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769 +1-631-244-3035 [email protected] =====================================================
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Prev by Date: Resignation of voting member
- Next by Date: 2010 COMCIFS annual report - request for information
- Prev by thread: Re: 2010 COMCIFS annual report - request for information
- Next by thread: Resignation of voting member
- Index(es):