Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Preserving CIF1 data sets

  • To: comcifs@iucr.org
  • Subject: Preserving CIF1 data sets
  • From: "Herbert J. Bernstein" <yaya@bernstein-plus-sons.com>
  • Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:07:12 -0500
  • In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101071052280.2950@epsilon.pair.com>
  • References: <AANLkTimWpd1kMZDGcTprEhcJw+uQE4_JtgJ4SbtMPVXt@mail.gmail.com><263453.61027.qm@web87016.mail.ird.yahoo.com><alpine.BSF.2.00.1101070742350.2950@epsilon.pair.com><4D271B81.2050501@rcsb.rutgers.edu><alpine.BSF.2.00.1101071052280.2950@epsilon.pair.com>
Do anyone recall if there ever was a formal decision on

"No changes are required in existing archival data files in order to 
apply domain dictionaries written in DDLm."

as stated in bold type on


It might help in avoiding further incorrect assumptions to know
if this is or is not a premise for DDLm and CIF2 development.

I for one think this would be a desirable premise.

  Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
    Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
         Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769


Reply to: [list | sender only]