Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ambiguity in atom_site.disorder_group value -1

Thank you, John. That was very interesting to me. So, perhaps, what I am thinking in terms of describing "local disorder groups" -- the pairing -- would be akin to the ability in a CIF file to describe bonding patterns, which (I think) are modeling aspects -- interpretation-based, not refinement-based. Does that sound right?

Jmol can certainly show any subgroup of these groupings, but it would be great if the depositor could indicate their interpretation as well and so show that as a default or by  some sort of selection.


coreDMG mailing list

[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]